These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Pharmacokinetics of cefepime: a review. Author: Van der Auwera P, Santella PJ. Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Nov; 32 Suppl B():103-15. PubMed ID: 8150753. Abstract: The pharmacokinetic profile of cefepime following single and repeated i.v. or im administration was evaluated in healthy volunteers (n = 130), volunteers with renal failure (n = 42), elderly volunteers (n = 24), and in infected patients (n = 10). Following a 30 min iv infusion of between 250 and 2000 mg, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased in proportion to the dose, indicative of linear kinetics. The Cmax ranged between 16.3 and 133 mg/L, with corresponding AUC values ranging between 34 and 263 mg.h/L. The elimination half-life (T1/2) was approximately 2 h and was dose-independent. Total clearance (Cltot) for all doses ranged between 122 and 136 mL/min. Renal clearance (Clren) varied between 96 and 116 mL/min, suggesting that cefepime is eliminated mainly by glomerular filtration. No probenecid studies have been performed. Urinary excretion was comparable at all dose levels, with the parent compound accounting for > 80% of the recovered dose (i.v. or im). Following single im doses of between 250 and 2000 mg, absorption was rapid and the Tmax was attained in 1-1.6 h. Values for Cmax and AUC increased in a dose-proportional manner. The T1/2 was approximately 2 h and independent of dose. The bioavailability following im administration of 2000 mg was 100%. No accumulation following multiple i.v. or im dosing over 10 days was observed. Binding to plasma proteins was 16%. The volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss) varied between 18 and 22 L and was dose-independent. The pharmacokinetic profiles of cefepime following single and repeated doses suggest that twice-daily administration by either the i.v. or im route is adequate to treat most infections caused by susceptible bacteria.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]