These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparative study of cefepime and ceftazidime in the treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.
    Author: Léophonte P, Bertrand A, Nouvet G, Muir JF, Lucht F, Delaval P, Depierre A, Hughes F, Ulmer M, Grès JJ.
    Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Nov; 32 Suppl B():165-73. PubMed ID: 8150760.
    Abstract:
    Antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia must target Gram-positive pathogens, especially frequently isolated organisms such as Streptococcus pneumoniae. The severity of community-acquired pneumonia is often related to underlying factors. Occasionally it may be complicated by staphylococcal or Gram-negative bacillary infection. We have compared the safety and efficacy of cefepime 1 g bd with ceftazidime 1 g tds as empirical treatment in adults with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). One hundred and thirty-one patients with moderate to severe LRTIs were randomized to two treatment groups: 87 received cefepime and 44 received ceftazidime. The treatment groups were comparable with regard to sex, age and treatment duration. Of the 116 pathogens isolated, 57 were Gram-positive (46 strains of S. pneumoniae) and 59 were Gram-negative (33 strains of Haemophilus influenzae). Of the 111 patients evaluated, clinical cure rates were 87% (65/75) in the cefepime group and 86% (31/36) in the ceftazidime group. Pathogen eradication rates were 95% (74/78 and 36/37, respectively) in both groups. Both drugs were well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events in each group was comparable. Cefepime 2 g per day (1 g bd) was as safe and effective as ceftazidime 3 g per day (1 g tds) in the treatment of community-acquired LRTIs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]