These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The calcium controversy revisited: implications of new data.
    Author: Prince R.
    Journal: Med J Aust; 1993 Sep 20; 159(6):404-7. PubMed ID: 8166791.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To review and synthesis recent literature relating to the skeletal effects of dietary calcium supplementation. DATA SOURCES: Six recent randomised controlled clinical trials are reviewed together with other relevant clinical and physiological studies. CONCLUSIONS: Recent controlled clinical trials of the effect of dietary calcium supplementation in postmenopausal women have supported the conclusion that increasing calcium intake can slow bone loss at appendicular and axial skeletal sites. Supplementation may be more effective in those with a low calcium intake or when combined with an exercise regimen in those with low bone mass, and was more effective in women further from the menopause. Calcium has its effect by reducing bone resorption. The effect of dietary calcium on bone is due to the absorbed fraction which is influenced negatively by other dietary factors such as dietary fibre and positively by the circulating concentration of the active form of vitamin D, calcitriol. To improve the efficacy of calcium supplements it will be necessary to optimise absorption. Nevertheless, in the light of these recent trials it would be reasonable to consider increasing the Australian recommended dietary intake for postmenopausal women to 1500 mg calcium per day.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]