MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Randomised comparison of CHOEP versus alternating hCHOP/IVEP for high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: treatment results and prognostic factor analysis in a multi-centre trial.
Author: Köppler H, Pflüger KH, Eschenbach I, Pfab R, Birkmann J, Zeller W, Holle R, Steinhauer UE, Gropp C, Oehl S.
Journal: Ann Oncol; 1994 Jan; 5(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8172793.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: With CHOP, the standard protocol of recent decades, about 30% of long-term survival has been reported. A number of studies using more aggressive multidrug regimens or alternating chemotherapies have recently suggested higher CR rates and increased survival. In 1989 we reported similar results with a combined-modality treatment administering 6 cycles of CHOP supplemented with etoposide and an involved field irradiation for patients in PR or CR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To confirm the efficacy of this approach, we initiated a prospective randomised trial comparing 4 cycles of CHOP-VP16 (CHOEP) with 4 cycles of two alternating regimens, 'hCHOP and IVEP'. One hundred seventy-five patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas stages II-IV were stratified for age, stage and LDH and randomised to receive either four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisolone (CHOEP) in arm A or four cycles of chemotherapy with a dose-intensified CHOP (hCHOP) alternating with ifosfamide, etoposide, vindesine, prednisolone (IVEP) in arm B. After four cycles of chemotherapy an involved field irradiation with a total dose of 35 Gy was given to all patients demonstrated to be in complete or partial remission. RESULTS: Of the 185 randomised patients, 175 were eligible and 171 evaluable for response and survival. One hundred forty-six of the 171 patients (85%) achieved complete remission (CR) with 87% and 84% CRs in arms A and B, respectively. With a median follow-up of 36 months the estimated overall survival at 2 years is 66% and 73% for arms A and B, respectively. The percentage of all patients in first CR is estimated to be 59% and 55% at 2 years for arms A and B, respectively. None of the differences in CR rate, survival, or relapse-free survival are statistically significant. Multivariate analysis of subgroups incorporating the factors of sex, age, performance status, stage, B symptoms, bulky disease, LDH and histology revealed that only stage and LDH were factors which independently affected outcome. The estimated 2-year survival rate of patients with stages II, III and IV is predicted to be 84%, 62% and 52%, respectively. Patients with LDH > 250 U/l have an estimated survival of 52% at 2 years versus 84% for patients with LDH < or = 250 U/l. According to the newly proposed international score system, the 2-year survival was 81% for low-risk-, 64% for low intermediate risk-, 50% for high intermediate risk-, and 43% for high-risk patients. The toxicity in both arms was tolerable. Three patients died of treatment-related causes (2 in arm A, 1 in arm B). The main toxicity was haematological with 75% of patients suffering from grades 3 or 4 neutropenia at some point during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no superior benefit for alternating regimens, and conclude that both are effective treatment protocols for aggressive histologic-type malignant lymphomas. The results obtained with four cycles of poly-chemotherapy followed by an involved field irradiation are comparable to programs using more aggressive and/or prolonged chemotherapy.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]