These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of antifungal therapy in hospitalized patients. I. Results prior to the marketing of fluconazole.
    Author: Grasela TH, Goodwin SD, Pasko MT, Walawander CA, Raebel MA.
    Journal: Ann Pharmacother; 1994 Feb; 28(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 8173147.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of antifungal agents in hospitalized patients prior to marketing of fluconazole and to assess characteristics associated with their use. DESIGN: A cohort of hospitalized patients receiving topical or systemic antifungal therapy was monitored concurrently. SETTING: Sixty-nine hospitals ranging in size from 100 to more than 500 beds, 70.1 percent affiliated with medical schools. PATIENTS: Participating clinical pharmacists each identified 15 consecutive patients receiving systemic antifungal therapy and 5 consecutive patients receiving topical antifungal therapy at their institutions. Data collection began October 1989 and ended March 1990. INTERVENTION: All data collected were observational in nature, and no patient intervention was required. MEASURES: Characteristics of patients receiving antifungal therapy were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Utilization and patterns of use of antifungal therapy were reported. RESULTS: The most common risk factors necessitating antifungal therapy, in descending order, were: administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics and/or presence of invasive catheters, carcinoma, AIDS, leukemia or lymphoma, diabetes mellitus, solid organ or bone marrow transplantation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Five hundred seventeen patients received systemic therapy and 464 (89.7 percent) received a single systemic agent. Of these, 242 (52.2 percent) received amphotericin B, 215 (46.3 percent) received ketoconazole, 6 (1.3 percent) received flucytosine, and 1 (0.2 percent) received intravenous miconazole. Fifty-three patients received two systemic agents either concurrently or consecutively. Ketoconazole was most often used for presumed or documented oral, urogenital, or esophageal infections and amphotericin B was the preferred agent for disseminated infections and fungemia (p < 0.001). Almost half of the patients receiving amphotericin B or ketoconazole (48.3 percent) received these drugs as empiric therapy. Documented infections were more likely to be treated with amphotericin B (54.8 percent) than with ketoconazole (27.4 percent) (p < 0.001). The predominant fungal isolates were Candida albicans, Candida spp., and unspecified yeasts. Amphotericin B toxicity led to discontinuation of drug therapy in only 5.1 percent of cases. Two hundred sixty-nine patients (34.2 percent) received topical antifungal therapy only. Nystatin oral suspension was prescribed to 65.3 percent of the patients, clotrimazole troches to 23.0 percent, amphotericin B irrigation to 10.9 percent, and nystatin tablets to 0.8 percent. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization patterns of antifungal agents in this survey follow established therapeutic guidelines. Prior to the introduction of fluconazole, amphotericin B was the agent of choice for documented systemic fungal infections. Ketoconazole was more often used for prophylaxis of fungal infections and treatment of oral and esophageal infections.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]