These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A comparative study in patients with Omnicarbon and Björk-Shiley heart valve replacement. Author: Otaki M. Journal: Int Surg; 1993; 78(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 8175264. Abstract: To compare the Omnicarbon heart valve and the Björk-Shiley spherical valve, operative results, hemodynamic parameters and late results were examined after mitral valve replacement. There were no early deaths, and 6 late deaths in the Omnicarbon valve (2.9% per patient-year). The actuarial survival rate at 6 years was 82.1 +/- 4.8% and freedom from valve-related complications was 86.4 +/- 2.2%. Pressure gradients and effective mitral valve areas at rest calculated by Gorlin's formula were satisfactory in both valve. Cardiac index (l/min/m2) was slightly changed according to the pacer-induced tachycardia, but there was a significant decrease in 160 bpm in the Omnicarbon valve (2.01 vs 2.39, p < 0.05). Peak pressure gradients and pressure half time by Doppler echocardiography, revealed the same trends as those of the Björk-Shiley valve during tachycardiac exercise, though regurgitant flow was detected in 7 patients in 160 bpm in the Omnicarbon valve, while in 2 in the Björk-Shiley valve (28% vs 10%, p = ns). Phonocardiographic study demonstrated that aortic closure to mitral opening click (AC-OpC) interval and Q wave of the electrocardiogram to mitral closing click (Q-CC) interval, which were related to the mitral valve gradients, fell within the normal range in both valves. However, the Björk-Shiley valve compared favorable to the Omnicarbon valve in the AC-OpC interval (70.9 msec vs 76.8 msec, p < 0.05). Hemolysis was of no clinical importance in the intact function of the Omnicarbon valve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]