These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Post-sclerotherapy bacterial peritonitis: a complication of sclerotherapy or of variceal bleeding?
    Author: Bac DJ, de Marie S, Siersema PD, Snobl J, van Buuren HR.
    Journal: Am J Gastroenterol; 1994 Jun; 89(6):859-62. PubMed ID: 8198094.
    Abstract:
    To assess the risk of bacterial peritonitis following endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (EVS), we recorded the incidence of this complication within 2 wk of the procedure in all patients (n = 216) undergoing 1092 sclerotherapy sessions in our hospital during a 5-yr period (1987-1992). The sclerotherapy sessions were separated in prophylactic EVS (without a previous bleeding, n = 172 sessions), elective EVS (following a previous variceal bleeding, n = 720), and emergency EVS (within 24 h of a variceal bleeding, n = 200). During the study period, 60 patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were recorded. In 10 patients, peritonitis was diagnosed within 14 days after EVS. Six patients received emergency EVS and four elective EVS. In seven patients, Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms were cultured from the ascitic fluid, and in three patients cultures were negative; however, an elevated ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cell count of > 0.5 x 10(9) cells/L was present. The mean period between EVS and the diagnosis of peritonitis was 3.5 days. On average, the patients had been febrile during 2.1 days before the diagnosis was established. None of the patients who had received prophylactic EVS developed peritonitis. The calculated risk to develop peritonitis following elective EVS was 0.5% (4/742 sessions) and following emergency EVS 3% (6/200 sessions) (p = 0.019, Fisher's exact test). Gram-negative gut-derived microorganisms were the most common pathogenic bacteria cultured from the ascites, which is different from the microbial flora causing bacteremia after EVS. This suggests that the risk for bacterial peritonitis is determined primarily by factors associated with bleeding, such as shock with increased bowel wall translocation of bacteria. These results indicate that standard antibiotic prophylaxis before EVS is not indicated, but could be considered in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites receiving emergency EVS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]