These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative trial of large-particle aerosol and nose drop administration of live attenuated influenza vaccines.
    Author: Gruber WC, Hinson HP, Holland KL, Thompson JM, Reed GW, Wright PF.
    Journal: J Infect Dis; 1993 Nov; 168(5):1282-5. PubMed ID: 8228364.
    Abstract:
    Healthy adult subjects (n = 198) were randomized to receive bivalent cold-adapted (ca) influenza A vaccine containing 10(7.4) TCID50 each of A/Kawasaki/9/86 (H1N1) and A/Los Angeles/2/87 (H3N2) by either nose drops (ND) or large-particle aerosol (LPA). All subjects had received monovalent inactivated influenza B vaccine intramuscularly in the previous year. Ninety percent of LPA recipients and 82% of ND recipients preferred intranasal administration to their previous experience with intramuscular vaccine. Twenty-six (27%) of 98 LPA recipients and 47 (49%) of 97 ND recipients reported swallowing vaccine (P = .008). Fever was observed uncommonly (< or = 5%), and incidence of respiratory symptoms was comparable between groups. Fourfold or greater hemagglutination antibody response to at least one of the influenza A vaccine viruses was significantly more frequent after LPA (64%) than ND vaccination (43%; P = .005). LPA administration of ca influenza to the nasopharynx was well tolerated, safe, and more immunogenic than ND delivery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]