These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Mechanical determinants of coronary blood flow during dynamic alterations in myocardial contractility.
    Author: Mulligan LJ, Escobedo D, Freeman GL.
    Journal: Am J Physiol; 1993 Oct; 265(4 Pt 2):H1112-8. PubMed ID: 8238397.
    Abstract:
    Recently it has been proposed that the decrease in coronary blood flow (CBF) resulting from cardiac contraction referred to as systolic flow impediment (SFI) is dependent on the level of left ventricular elastance (Ees). The average rate of LV relaxation (Ravg) has been shown to be major determinant of diastolic flow development (DFD). We tested these hypotheses using the unique hemodynamic condition of pulsus alternans (PA) where end-systolic LV pressure and instantaneous Ees vary on beat-to-beat basis. In six mongrel dogs instrumented with LV and aortic manometers, ultrasonic dimension crystals, and Doppler coronary flow probes we measured phasic CBF and Ees during PA and control conditions. Maximal pressure development over time (dP/dtmax) and SFI were significantly different between weak (WB) and strong beats (SB) as were Ravg and DFD. Minimum CBF (Qmin) was not different between SB and WB; however, Qmin and peak Ees occurred nearly simultaneously in the WB. Qmin occurred much earlier than peak Ees in the strong and control beats. Plots of instantaneous LV elastance and CBF showed that for control beats and for the strong beats of PA CBF was similar during systole and diastole, suggesting elastance is a unique determinant of CBF. This was quantified as CBF at the time in either systole or diastole when elastance was half-maximal for that beat (E50). During the WB of PA, however, CBF at E50 was significantly higher during systole than during diastole. We conclude that while SFI and DFD are highly dependent on the dP/dt and Ravg, Ees is not a unique determinant of CBF under all conditions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]