These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Induction of cleavage in topoisomerase I c-DNA by topoisomerase I enzymes from calf thymus and wheat germ in the presence and absence of camptothecin. Author: Tanizawa A, Kohn KW, Pommier Y. Journal: Nucleic Acids Res; 1993 Nov 11; 21(22):5157-66. PubMed ID: 8255771. Abstract: In this study, we further examined the sequence selectivity of camptothecin in mammalian topoisomerase I cDNA from human and Chinese hamster. In the absence of camptothecin, almost all the bases at the 3'-terminus of cleavage sites are T for calf thymus and wheat germ topoisomerase I. In addition, wheat germ topoisomerase I exhibits preference for C (or not T) at -3 and for T at -2 position. As for camptothecin-stimulated cleavage with topoisomerase I, G (or not T) at +1 is an additional strong preference. This sequence selectivity of camptothecin is similar to that previously found in SV40 DNA, suggesting that camptothecin preferentially interacts with topoisomerase I-mediated cleavage sites where G is the base at the 5'-terminus. These results support the stacking model of camptothecin (Jaxel et al. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 20418-20423). Comparison of calf thymus and wheat germ topoisomerase I-mediated cleavage sites in the presence of camptothecin shows that many major cleavage sites are similar. However, the relative intensities are often different. One of the differences was attributable to a bias at position -3 where calf thymus topoisomerase I prefers G and wheat germ topoisomerase I prefers C. This difference may explain the unique patterns of cleavage sites induced by the two enzymes. Sequencing analysis of camptothecin-stimulated cleavage sites in the surrounding regions of point mutations in topoisomerase I cDNA, which were found in camptothecin-resistant cell lines, reveals no direct relationship between DNA cleavage sites in vitro and mutation sites.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]