These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparison of electrophysiologic effects of quinidine and amiodarone in sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with coronary artery disease. Author: Pastor A, Almendral JM, Arenal A, Lorca MT, Delcán JL. Journal: Am J Cardiol; 1993 Dec 15; 72(18):1389-94. PubMed ID: 8256732. Abstract: Fifteen patients with spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias underwent electrophysiologic studies at baseline and during therapy with quinidine and amiodarone. In 9, ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a similar QRS morphology was induced with quinidine, amiodarone and under the control state. Both quinidine and amiodarone significantly increased QRS duration and the VT cycle length. Amiodarone increased the VT cycle length more than quinidine (85 vs 121 ms, p < 0.05). Amiodarone increased the percent QRS duration (during sinus rhythm, ventricular pacing and VT) significantly less than percent VT cycle length, whereas quinidine did so only at slow rates (at faster rates the percent increase in QRS duration is not different from the percent increase in VT cycle length). The percent increase in QRS duration produced by quinidine correlated significantly with the percent increase in VT cycle length (the best correlation was observed during pacing, r = 0.78). In contrast, no such significant correlations were obtained for amiodarone. Thus, amiodarone prolongs VT cycle length more than quinidine (at the doses used). The effects of quinidine on conduction in tissue mostly unrelated to tachycardia origin predict effects in the tachycardia cycle length. In contrast, the effects of amiodarone on the latter are more intense but not predicted by those on tissue unrelated to the tachycardia origin.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]