These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cystic fibrosis carrier screening: knowledge and attitudes of prenatal care providers.
    Author: Rowley PT, Loader S, Levenkron JC, Phelps CE.
    Journal: Am J Prev Med; 1993; 9(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 8257614.
    Abstract:
    We are conducting a trial of population carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF), targeting pregnant and nonpregnant patients of prenatal care providers. We first enlisted providers by presenting a description of the trial to the obstetrical staffs of the five Rochester, New York, hospitals having delivery services. Of the 124 prenatal care providers (111 obstetricians and 13 family practitioners) with delivery privileges at the five hospitals, only 81 (65%) attended one of our presentations. Providers who attended lacked knowledge about CF screening and counseling and expressed divergent attitudes about prenatal diagnosis for carrier women having test-negative partners. Of the 79 providers completing an attitude questionnaire, 68 (86%) were willing to offer carrier screening to all their patients if educational materials, testing, and counseling were all provided without charge. After visiting participating physicians' offices to orient their staff, we reached two additional conclusions. First, in considering whether to offer CF carrier screening to their patients, prenatal care providers are less concerned about imperfect test sensitivity, false reassurance of those testing negative, or discrimination against those testing positive than about time required to answer patients' questions if they screen and about legal liability if they do not. Second, some providers are more resistant to offering screening to nonpregnant patients than to pregnant patients, not because they believe that the timing is less appropriate, but because nonpregnant patients do not routinely receive an advance mailing, have phlebotomy, or return for follow-up. Our experience raises concerns about the willingness and capability of prenatal care providers to translate advances in molecular medicine into prenatal screening services.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]