These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Conformational variability of chicken cystatin. Comparison of structures determined by X-ray diffraction and NMR spectroscopy.
    Author: Engh RA, Dieckmann T, Bode W, Auerswald EA, Turk V, Huber R, Oschkinat H.
    Journal: J Mol Biol; 1993 Dec 20; 234(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 8263913.
    Abstract:
    The structural model derived from X-ray crystallography for unphosphorylated wild-type chicken cystatin is compared with two chicken cystatin structures derived from NMR spectroscopy: the phosphorylated wild-type and the genetically engineered variant AEF-SIM-M29I-M89L. The comparison shows the same overall fold, but also significant differences in structurally variable segments of the polypeptide chain. The largest such segment, comprising residues 71 to 89, is a region characteristic of the family 2 cystatin inhibitors which contains a disulphide bridge (71-81) and the phosphorylation site (Ser80) discussed in the accompanying article. In the crystal structure, the segment 71 to 76 is found as a flexible loop, 77 to 85 as an alpha-helical segment, and 86 to 89 is completely undefined. The solution NMR structures on the other hand are disordered in the initial segment 72 to 80, have an extended conformation at 81 to 83 in contact with the beta-sheet, and clearly show a beta-turn at residues 87 to 90. The segment comprising residues 53 to 57, with smaller variability, is of particular interest as the hairpin loop conserved throughout the cystatin superfamily which binds to the cysteine proteinase. In most of the solution NMR structures, this segment adopts a conformation more like that of stefin B, a family 1 cystatin inhibitor, as was observed in the crystal structure of its inhibitory complex with papain. The differences between the structures are rationalized by an examination of the crystal contacts generated by hypothetical crystal packing of the NMR structures. Additionally, the X-ray refinement shows evidence of conformational disorder in the crystal. Joint refinement with NOE restraints and reflection data does not produce a structure to satisfy the restraints of both methods.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]