These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of preparation techniques with reference to final spermatozoa concentration and survival and fertilization rate in vitro in normal and pathologic ejaculates].
    Author: Zech H, Moschig M, Weiss P, Zech J.
    Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Oct; 53(10):715-20. PubMed ID: 8270156.
    Abstract:
    Various methods are available in the preparation of normal and pathological ejaculates within the framework of available techniques of assisted reproduction. The authors examined the recovery rate, the long-term motility and the fertilization rate in vitro after both normal and pathological test results, of preparations, using one of the three most commonly used techniques. Centrifugation with its resulting swim up (Z) is a method still widely used because of the good sperm recovery rate it produces. However, in our tests, it achieved the lowest level capacity, compared with sperm separation by migration/sedimentation, with resultant swim up (M) and Percoll gradient centrifugation (P). The statistically highly significant fast decline of motility after preparation by Z, compared with the other two above mentioned techniques, in both normal and pathological ejaculates is a further indication, that Z has a negative influence upon the integrity of the spermatozoa. The results of research submitted here suggest the abandonment of Z in its standard form in favour of other techniques. After normal test results, both M and P might be used, but in the case of pathological ejaculate, P would be recommended.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]