These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Visual projections induced into the auditory pathway of ferrets: II. Corticocortical connections of primary auditory cortex.
    Author: Pallas SL, Sur M.
    Journal: J Comp Neurol; 1993 Nov 08; 337(2):317-33. PubMed ID: 8277005.
    Abstract:
    Although the development of corticocortical projections has been well studied, less is known about the role of sensory inputs in the specification of these connections. As part of an ongoing series of studies in our laboratory, we have examined the role of thalamic input modality in the development of corticocortical connections. These studies involve making unilateral lesions and inducing retinal inputs into the auditory thalamus (MGN) during early development in ferrets, thereby conferring visual responsiveness on primary auditory cortex (AI). In this way we can examine the role of input identity in cortical specification in general, and connectivity patterns specifically. A previous paper (Pallas et al. [1990] J. Comp. Neurol. 298:50-68) described the pattern of thalamocortical and corticothalamic connections of auditory cortex in normal and lesioned animals. This study compares the pattern of auditory corticocortical connections in normal and lesioned animals. We injected neuroanatomical tracers into AI and mapped out the distribution of retrogradely labelled cells in the cortex. We report that the cortical inputs to ferret AI resembled those in cats, and that the pattern of ipsi- and contralateral corticocortical connections of ferret AI with visual input was similar to the normal pattern. Auditory cortex with visual input did not make ectopic connections with visual cortex, but maintained its connections with other auditory cortical areas. These results suggest that the overall corticocortical connections of an area are not influenced by the modality or activity pattern of its inputs. In particular, altering the input activity to a cortical area does not seem to promote the formation of entirely new connections, although small changes in the strength of existing connections are possible (Sur et al. [1990] Trends Neurosci. 13:227-233).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]