These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth. Author: Hasselrot L. Journal: Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027. Abstract: During 1988-89, 224 patients with approximal caries in the premolar/molar regions were provided with 318 tunnel restorations. In case of perforation of the enamel in the enamel/dentin border, (23%), complete Class II-tunnel restorations with glass ionomer cement and composite resin were made. In case of "intact" enamel, (77%), partial Class I-tunnel restorations were made. The restorations were controlled at annual routine recalls and the success rate after 3 1/2 years was 74% for permanent teeth, and 10% for primary teeth. Restorations in permanent teeth, made during the second year of the study were successful in 82%, as compared with 62% for restorations made during the first year, indicating a learning effect. Failures in the permanent dentition were due to marginal ridge fracture (35%), cavitation in the approximal enamel (31%), and recurrent caries (38%). Failures in primary teeth were predominantly due to marginal ridge fractures (84%). A comparison with the longevity of conventional Class II restorations is made and the possible advantages of the present method are presented.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]