These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Artifacts in intravascular ultrasound imaging: analyses and implications.
    Author: Finet G, Maurincomme E, Tabib A, Crowley RJ, Magnin I, Roriz R, Beaune J, Amiel M.
    Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol; 1993; 19(7):533-47. PubMed ID: 8310550.
    Abstract:
    The ability of an intravascular ultrasound catheter to give cross-sectional images of vessel walls and surrounding tissues, and the behavior of ultrasound in heterogeneous media, are at the origin of degradation of image quality. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of in vivo studies are then operator-dependent and are limited by artifacts. We investigated these limitations by an in vitro study on plexiglass phantoms and segments of fresh arteries. We used a 20 MHz transducer mounted on the tip of a 4.8 F catheter and an interventional ultrasound system. The ultrasound beam is reflected onto the rotating transducer at 600 rotations per minute (RPM), creating 360 degrees real-time images (10 images/second). We then observed, analyzed and interpreted the most specific reasons for image artifacts: geometric distortions, multiple echoes, the point spread function (PSF) of the imaging system, near-field effects, "petal-shaped" effect, and ultrasound speckle. Various practical implications have resulted from this study. Only a thorough knowledge of how to avoid some of the most obvious pitfalls will enable the user to obtain maximum benefits from intravascular ultrasound imaging, and to appreciate its limitations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]