These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An adenosine A1 receptor agonist, R(-)-N-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine (PIA), but not adenosine itself, acts as a therapeutic preconditioning-mimetic agent in rabbits.
    Author: Hale SL, Bellows SD, Hammerman H, Kloner RA.
    Journal: Cardiovasc Res; 1993 Dec; 27(12):2140-5. PubMed ID: 8313421.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: A preconditioning mimetic agent could be useful therapy for cardiac ischaemic events; stimulation of adenosine receptors has been proposed as a preconditioning mediator. The ability of adenosine-receptor activation to mimic ischaemic preconditioning was tested in an in vivo rabbit model. METHODS: Adenosine (15 mg, a maximally tolerated dose, n = 10) was infused over six minutes via a coronary artery and compared with saline (n = 12) in anaesthetised rabbits. Five minutes after infusion, a coronary artery was occluded for 40 minutes followed by three hours of reperfusion. In a second study, preischaemic intravenous treatment with adenosine (25 mg.kg-1, n = 9), or an A1-adenosine agonist, R(-)-N-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine (PIA, 900 micrograms.kg-1, n = 12), were compared with saline (n = 12), when given before 40 minutes of coronary artery ligation and three hours of reperfusion in anaesthetised rabbits. RESULTS: Intracoronary adenosine reduced mean arterial pressure during infusion (48(3) v 80(4) mm Hg, control, p < 0.001); however, infusion regional myocardial blood flow was significantly higher in adenosine treated hearts (5.00(0.90) v 2.30(0.26) ml.min-1 x g-1, p < 0.02) in the region later to become ischaemic. During occlusion ischaemic blood flow was similar in both groups as was the size of the ischaemic risk region, expressed as a % of the left ventricle (42(3)% adenosine and 37(3)% control, NS). Intracoronary adenosine treatment failed to reduce infarct size (52(5)% of the risk zone v 57(7)% in controls, NS). In the second protocol, heart rate immediately after treatment was reduced by both intravenous denosine (26%) and PIA (22%) v control, indicating atrial A1 receptor activation. Treatment with PIA resulted in a significant reduction in ultimate infarct size compared with saline (38(5)% of risk region v 57(5)%, p < 0.05). Adenosine, however, failed to reduce infarct size (50(8)%, NS v saline). There were no differences between area at risk or myocardial blood flow among groups. CONCLUSION: The adenosine agonist PIA but not adenosine itself might be a useful adjunctive therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]