These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Maternal exercise during pregnancy, physical fitness, and fetal growth.
    Author: Hatch MC, Shu XO, McLean DE, Levin B, Begg M, Reuss L, Susser M.
    Journal: Am J Epidemiol; 1993 May 15; 137(10):1105-14. PubMed ID: 8317440.
    Abstract:
    The value of exercise during pregnancy is controversial; both benefits and risks have been hypothesized. As empiric evidence is scant, the issue was investigated in a prospective study that assessed the impact on fetal growth of maternal exercise in each trimester of pregnancy. A cohort of over 800 prenatal patients was recruited from obstetric practices in Pennsylvania and New York between January 1987 and June 1989. Subjects were interviewed at entry into care and recontacted at 28 and 36 weeks of gestation. In women with prior adverse outcomes or a lack of conditioning, the associations between maternal exercise and fetal growth were equivocal. In fit, low-risk, prenatal patients, exercise was positively associated with fetal growth. With low-moderate exercise levels, the adjusted mean birth weights were about 100 g higher than in nonexercisers (117 g; 95% confidence interval 17 to 217 g). With heavier exercise, larger birth weight increments were seen, close to 300 g in those who exercised throughout pregnancy at levels of about 2,000 kcal/week in energy expenditure (276 g; 95% confidence interval 54 to 497 g). These results suggest that the guidelines issued by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists may be too stringent for well-conditioned, low-risk, prenatal patients. Additional research to define safe limits more precisely seems warranted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]