These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The protection of ischaemic preconditioning can be reinstated in the rabbit heart after the initial protection has waned.
    Author: Yang XM, Arnoult S, Tsuchida A, Cope D, Thornton JD, Daly JF, Cohen MV, Downey JM.
    Journal: Cardiovasc Res; 1993 Apr; 27(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 8324785.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Preconditioning the heart with 5 min of ischaemia followed by reperfusion renders the myocardium resistant to infarction from subsequent ischaemia. This protection lasts for about 1 h. The aim of this study was to test whether the protection could be reinstated with a second episode of preconditioning after protection from an initial episode had worn off. METHODS: To induce infarction animals experienced 30 min of coronary artery occlusion and then 3 h reperfusion. Ischaemic preconditioning was accomplished with 5 min of coronary branch occlusion. In one group of rabbits the subsequent reperfusion period was prolonged to 2 h to permit protection to wear off before the 30 min coronary occlusion was initiated. In another group a second 5 min coronary occlusion was performed at the end of the 2 h reperfusion. After 10 min of reperfusion the 30 min ischaemic period began. Control animals experienced only the 30 min ischaemia and 3 h reperfusion. Infarct volume was measured with tetrazolium and expressed as a percentage of the ischaemic zone volume. RESULTS: Average infarct size in seven control rabbits [36.0 (SEM 2.0)% of the ischaemic zone] was not significantly different from that in eight rabbits with the prolonged coronary occlusion occurring 2 h after the preconditioning stimulus [28.6 (2.9)% infarction]. In contrast infarcts were significantly smaller in the re-preconditioned group of seven rabbits [8.3 (4.2)%] and comparable to those previously seen with a single preconditioning stimulus followed 10 min later by the 30 min occlusion [6.1 (1.8)%]. CONCLUSIONS: The rabbit heart can be protected with a second preconditioning stimulus after protection from an initial period of preconditioning has subsided.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]