These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Energy cost of ambulation with different methods of foot and ankle immobilization. Author: Fowler PT, Botte MJ, Mathewson JW, Speth SR, Byrne TP, Sutherland DH. Journal: J Orthop Res; 1993 May; 11(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 8326448. Abstract: In order to measure the energy cost of immobilization of the foot and ankle during ambulation, 14 healthy male volunteers exercised while wearing various immobilization devices. Oxygen consumption, oxygen cost, cardiac output, minute ventilation, heart rate, stroke volume, stride length, and stride frequency were determined at a steady state of exercise as the subjects walked on a treadmill at 80 m/min (equivalent to the comfortable walking speed of approximately 3 mi/h). Each subject was tested with three different types of immobilization devices: a short leg walking cast, a prefabricated lower leg orthosis, and a rigid-soled surgical shoe. The results were compared with those for the same men ambulating without an immobilization device. Ambulation with the short leg walking cast and the prefabricated lower leg orthosis required significantly more energy in comparison with control values (all p values < 0.006) in terms of oxygen cost, cardiac index, oxygen consumption, and minute ventilation. However, when the rigid-soled surgical shoe was worn, energy consumption as measured by all parameters was not significantly increased compared with control values. Comparison of the findings for the short leg walking cast and the prefabricated lower leg orthosis showed no significant differences in any parameter of energy consumption. Stride length, however, was significantly shorter in the short leg walking cast compared with all immobilizers tested.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]