These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cardiovascular effects of i.v. induction in children: comparison between propofol and thiopentone.
    Author: Aun CS, Sung RY, O'Meara ME, Short TG, Oh TE.
    Journal: Br J Anaesth; 1993 Jun; 70(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 8329259.
    Abstract:
    We have compared the haemodynamic responses to i.v. propofol 2.5 mg kg-1 with those to thiopentone 5.0 mg kg-1 in 41 healthy Chinese children at induction of anaesthesia. They were allocated to four groups according to their age and induction agent received: group 1 < 2 yr, propofol, n = 9; group II < 2 yr, thiopentone, n = 9; group III 2-12 yr, propofol, n = 12; group IV 2-12 yr, thiopentone, n = 11. Anaesthesia was maintained by spontaneous ventilation with 70% nitrous oxide and 0.5% halothane in oxygen. Arterial pressure and heart rate were monitored by automatic oscillotonometer. Stroke volume was measured by two-dimensional echocardiography and pulse Doppler. Measurements were made before induction and at 1-min intervals for 5 min after induction. The reduction in mean arterial pressure was significantly greater after propofol (28-31%) than after thiopentone (14-21%) (P = 0.001). The reduction in cardiac index (10-15%) after induction was not significantly different between the two agents (P = 0.122). Baroreflex mediated increases in heart rate and systemic vascular resistance were less after propofol than after thiopentone. The baroreceptor reflex was more attenuated in children aged less than 2 yr than in older children.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]