These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Intraoperative fine needle aspiration of pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary masses. Author: Earnhardt RC, McQuone SJ, Minasi JS, Feldman PS, Jones RS, Hanks JB. Journal: Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Aug; 177(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 8342094. Abstract: Intraoperative fine needle aspiration (IFNA) of masses of the pancreas and extrahepatic biliary system provides a method of rapid tissue diagnosis with a much lower complication rate than either wedge or large bore needle biopsies. Few series include IFNA of extrahepatic biliary system masses in their analyses. We retrospectively evaluated all IFNA of pancreatic, extrahepatic biliary and ampullary masses at the University of Virginia from March 1981 to December 1991 to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this procedure. Ninety-nine IFNA were performed--75 of the pancreas, 17 of the extrahepatic biliary system and seven of the ampulla. All aspirations were performed with direct visualization or palpation of the tumor, or both, using several passes with a 22 gauge needle. A diagnostic "positive" or "negative" reading was rendered in 90 of 99 IFNA. Carcinoma was confirmed by positive tissue diagnosis or clinical course consistent with cancer. Benign disease was confirmed by negative pathologic factors from a resected specimen or confirmatory clinical course of at least 18 months. Diagnosis was confirmed by these criteria in 82 patients. Thirty-four of 43 patients with confirmed carcinoma of the pancreas had positive cytologic factors by IFNA. Three pancreas IFNA were deemed as "suspicious" and six as "unsatisfactory." Two patients with "suspicious" findings had pathologically confirmed well-differentiated carcinoma. Carcinoma of the ampulla and extrahepatic biliary tract was detected by IFNA in 17 of 18 confirmed patients. The overall sensitivity of positive or negative IFNA in this series in 90 percent, with 100 percent specificity and 92 percent accuracy. IFNA has a positive predictive value of 100 percent and negative predictive value of 74 percent. We conclude that IFNA is a highly accurate diagnostic procedure and represents the preferred technique of obtaining an intraoperative tissue diagnosis in masses of the pancreas, extrahepatic biliary tract and ampulla. Positive IFNA may definitively guide surgical decision-making; however, we caution that negative IFNA cannot be relied on definitively to exclude the diagnosis of carcinoma.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]