These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Gentamicin clearance during hemodialysis: a comparison of high-efficiency cuprammonium rayon and conventional cellulose ester hemodialyzers.
    Author: Agarwal R, Toto RD.
    Journal: Am J Kidney Dis; 1993 Aug; 22(2):296-9. PubMed ID: 8352256.
    Abstract:
    The advent of high-efficiency hemodialyzers has afforded improved efficiency of urea clearance; however, increased clearance of other substances, particularly antibiotics, also may occur, necessitating changes in clinical practice. Accordingly, we compared the efficiency of gentamicin removal using two different hemodialyzers, a conventional saponified cellulose ester (CD 135) and a high-efficiency cuprammonium rayon dialyzer (TAF 175L), in eight hospitalized patients undergoing antibiotic therapy for suspected or proven gram-negative infection. The rate of dialysis, estimated as the ratio of dialyzer urea clearance (K) to urea distribution volume (V) (K/V urea), and the total elimination rate constant (k) of gentamicin were measured during 17 hemodialysis treatments. The K/V urea for the two dialyzers, TAF 175L and CD 135, was 0.390 +/- 0.024 hr-1 and 0.413 +/- 0.129 hr-1 (P = NS), respectively. The TAF 175L hemodialyzer was almost twice as efficient in removing gentamicin as the CD 135: TAF 175, k = 0.263 +/- 0.024 hr-1; CD 135, k = 0.132 +/- 0.027 hr-1 (P < 0.001). Moreover, the rate of dialysis (K/V urea) was correlated with k of gentamicin for the TAF 175L dialyzer (r2 = 0.50, P < 0.02) but not for the CD 135 dialyzer. We conclude that dialyzer characteristics and the rate of dialysis (K/V urea) should be taken into consideration when determining the dosage of gentamicin in patients on hemodialysis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]