These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Evaluation of visual field defects, motility disorders and diplopia within the scope of accident insurance law].
    Author: Schipper J, Landau K, Hornung R.
    Journal: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 May; 202(5):382-5. PubMed ID: 8377398.
    Abstract:
    Visual Field: The determination of the level of compensation for loss of integrity is based on the Goldmann Perimetry. In case of concentric loss of the visual field the SUVA Tables 1989 are used. Hemi- and Quadrantanopsias are still evaluated according to the Rintelen Tables from 1954. No guidelines are available for the evaluation of central and paracentral skotomas. It is uncertain if automatic perimetry can be used routinely in the future for the evaluation of visual function. Motility Disorders and Diplopia: The evaluation of functional loss caused by diplopia is very difficult. Therefore a big variation of 5-30% has been determined. It is up to the specialist to evaluate the extent of the damage. In this study we looked for a correlation between the objective findings and the subjective complaints. Such a correlation could not be found so that an arbitrary classification depending on the extent of the diplopia must be recommended. This would create an analogy to the evaluation of the loss of visual acuity and visual field where no freedom is left to the judgement of the physician. Some reflections are given on the sense and benefit of the unique Swiss law concerning compensation for loss of integrity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]