These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Regulated activity of the distal promoter-like element of the human corticotropin-releasing hormone gene and secondary structural features of its corresponding transcripts.
    Author: Vamvakopoulos NC, Chrousos GP.
    Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol; 1993 Jul; 94(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 8397123.
    Abstract:
    Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) plays a major role in the coordination of the stress response. Its gene is expressed in multiple brain regions, the peripheral sympathetic system and the placenta, as well as in peripheral inflammatory sites where CRH acts as a pro-inflammatory cytokine. The human (h) CRH gene, in addition to its primary promoter (TATA box I), has a second distal promoter-like structure (TATA box II) and a functional cyclic adenosine monophosphate-responsive element, all of which are preserved in the rat and ovine genes. To examine the functionality of TATA II, we positioned a 881-bp-long segment of the 5' flanking region of the hCRH gene containing TATA II, but lacking TATA I, upstream from a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene cloned in a pUC vector. We transfected COS-7 cells with this construct and examined responsiveness of CAT activity to potential stimulants and inhibitors. Phorbol ester (TPA) and forskolin had mild but clear stimulatory effects on CAT expression (approximately 1.5- and approximately 1.3-fold, respectively), with a combined effect of approximately 1.9-fold. Dexamethasone (DEX) inhibited TPA-stimulated CAT activity by approximately 2.6-fold. In contrast, in the presence of a co-transfected glucocorticoid receptor cDNA expression plasmid, DEX augmented TPA-stimulated CAT expression by approximately 3.1-fold. The predicted secondary structures of the primary transcripts employing the distal and proximal promoters had significant differences, which could affect their stability and translatability.2
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]