These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Fine-needle biopsy: prospective comparison of aspiration versus nonaspiration techniques in the abdomen.
    Author: Kinney TB, Lee MJ, Filomena CA, Krebs TL, Dawson SL, Smith PL, Raafat N, Mueller PR.
    Journal: Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):549-52. PubMed ID: 8421763.
    Abstract:
    A prospective study was designed to compare the aspiration (suction method) and nonaspiration (nonsuction method) techniques of fine-needle biopsy (FNB) in 50 consecutive patients with abdominal pathologic conditions. Sites of biopsy included liver (n = 24), retroperitoneum (n = 9), adrenal gland (n = 5), pancreas (n = 4), omentum (n = 4), and miscellaneous sites (n = 4). Aspiration and nonaspiration FNBs were performed in each lesion with 22-gauge needles, and results were interpreted by a single cytopathologist. Cytologic specimens obtained with each technique were analyzed for diagnostic accuracy, total number of cell clusters per biopsy (graded 0-10, 10-20, 20-30, and > 30), presence of crush artifact, and amount of blood present (graded from 0 to +3). No significant differences were seen between the aspiration and nonaspiration techniques with regard to number of cell clusters per biopsy (44 of 50 specimens vs 42 of 50) (P < .0003), amount of blood present (grade 2.3 vs 2.2) (P < .0003), and amount of crush artifact. The positive predictive value for the aspiration technique was 91.5% versus 74% for the nonaspiration technique. The aspiration technique of FNB appears superior to the nonaspiration technique in the abdomen.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]