These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Potential usefulness of hydrogen breath test with D-xylose in clinical management of intestinal malabsorption.
    Author: Casellas F, Chicharro L, Malagelada JR.
    Journal: Dig Dis Sci; 1993 Feb; 38(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 8425444.
    Abstract:
    Hydrogen breath tests (H2 BT) have been used extensively to investigate intestinal disaccharidase deficiencies. A potentially useful test for assessing intestinal absorptive function, the H2 BT with D-xylose (H2 BT-D-xylose), has received scant attention. We report here the results of our investigation of this test in 45 patients. Fifteen patients had proved malabsorption that was due to nontropical sprue in nine, and to lymphoma, Whipple's disease, or giardiasis in the remainder. Nine patients had small-bowel bacterial overgrowth secondary to either postsurgical sequelae or intestinal dysmotility. Twenty-one patients with irritable bowel syndrome and 21 healthy individuals served as control groups. All participants ingested 25 g of D-xylose, and alveolar breath samples were obtained thereafter at 30 min intervals for 5 hr. Breath H2 was measured by chromatography. Basal H2 production, peak change (delta) and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Simultaneously, 5-hr urinary excretion of D-xylose was measured by colorimetry and served as the reference test. In healthy individuals, D-xylose ingestion increased H2 production (delta = 5.8 +/- 1.4 ppm, P < 0.001). Changes were similar in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome. In contrast, the increase was of a much greater magnitude in the malabsorption group (delta = 49.9 +/- 7.2 ppm, P < 0.001 vs healthy controls). AUC analysis yielded comparable results. Test performance analysis showed that, in malabsorption the H2 BT-D-xylose had a sensitivity index of 0.86, which was identical to that of the urinary D-xylose test. Specificity was 1 and 0.95, respectively; and predictability 1 and 0.93, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]