These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of midazolam and diazepam for conscious sedation in the emergency department.
    Author: Wright SW, Chudnofsky CR, Dronen SC, Kothari R, Birrer P, Blanton DM, Bruner A.
    Journal: Ann Emerg Med; 1993 Feb; 22(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 8427432.
    Abstract:
    STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of diazepam and midazolam when used for conscious sedation in emergency department patients. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. SETTING: Three university EDs. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Patients requiring one of the following procedures: abscess drainage, joint reduction, extensive suturing, chest tube insertion, or lumbar puncture. INTERVENTIONS: Diazepam (2.5 mg/mL) or midazolam (1 mg/mL) was administered until the desired level of sedation was achieved to a maximum of 5 mL. Fentanyl citrate was administered if needed for pain. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received diazepam and 36 received midazolam. Patients receiving midazolam had a greater degree of early sedation (P < .05), a higher 90-minute alertness scale score (P < .05), more patients ready for discharge at 90 minutes (P = .05), significantly less recall for the procedure (P < .02), and less pain on injection (P < .01) than patients who were given diazepam. CONCLUSIONS: Diazepam and midazolam are both effective for conscious sedation in ED patients. Midazolam causes less pain on injection, a significantly greater degree of early sedation, and a more rapid return to baseline function.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]