These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effect of vasopressin on left ventricular performance. Author: Cheng CP, Igarashi Y, Klopfenstein HS, Applegate RJ, Shihabi Z, Little WC. Journal: Am J Physiol; 1993 Jan; 264(1 Pt 2):H53-60. PubMed ID: 8430861. Abstract: We assessed the effect of arginine vasopressin (AVP) on left ventricular (LV) performance in eight conscious dogs. Five minutes after AVP infusion (6 microns.kg-1 x min-1 for 2 min) the plasma AVP was elevated from 3.9 +/- 0.9 to 14.7 +/- 4.6 pg/ml (P < 0.05). With all reflexes intact, AVP caused significant increases in LV end-systolic pressure (P) (112 +/- 8 vs. 122 +/- 7 mmHg, P < 0.05) end-systolic volume (V) (30 +/- 5.8 vs. 38 +/- 7.7 ml, P < 0.05), total systemic resistance (6.2 +/- 1.8 vs. 10.6 +/- 4.0 mmHg.dl-1 x min, P < 0.01) and arterial elastance (Ea) (6.8 +/- 3.0 vs. 8.6 +/- 3.9 mmHg/ml, P < 0.05), while the heart rate (110 +/- 6 vs. 82 +/- 10 beats/min, P < 0.05) and stroke volume (16.5 +/- 4.3 vs. 14.2 +/- 3.9 ml, P < 0.05) were decreased. There was no significant change in the coronary sinus blood flow (82 +/- 19 vs. 78 +/- 22 ml/min, P = not significant). AVP decreased the slopes of LV end-systolic P-V relation (10.7 +/- 1.1 vs. 8.1 +/- 1.9 mmHg/ml, P < 0.05), the maximal first derivative of LV pressure (dP/dtmax)-end-diastolic volume (VED) relation (135.2 +/- 18.7 vs. 63.1 +/- 7.7 mmHg.s-1 x ml-1, P < 0.05), and the stroke work-VED relation (81.1 +/- 4.1 vs. 66.7 +/- 2.8 mmHg, P < 0.05) and shifted the relations to the right, indicating a depression of LV performance. A similar increase in Ea produced by methoxamine did not depress LV performance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]