These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Intermediate-term outcome of renal retransplants in the cyclosporine era.
    Author: Sumrani NB, Miles AM, Daskalakis P, Hong JH, Markell MS, Friedman EA, Sommer BG.
    Journal: ASAIO J; 1993; 39(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8439680.
    Abstract:
    To determine the influence of selected parameters on intermediate-term outcome of renal retransplants, univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed on all 100 consecutive cyclosporine treated retransplants performed between 1984 and 1990 (mean follow up, 4.6 +/- 2.3 years). Actual 1 year and actuarial 5 year graft survivals were higher in living compared with cadaver donor transplants (84% and 79% vs 69% and 56%, respectively; p < 0.05). Among cadaver donor transplant recipients, allografts with immediate early function had better 1 and 5 year graft survivals when compared with those with delayed function (81% and 62% vs 59% and 38%, respectively; p < 0.05). Recipients with acute rejection had inferior 1 year and 5 year graft survivals when compared with rejection free patients (65% and 35% vs 80% and 57%, respectively; p < 0.05). Graft survival time of primary transplants was also a significant predictor of retransplant outcome with 1 and 5 year graft survivals of 50% and 36%, respectively, in patients in whom primary grafts survived less than 3 months, compared with 75% and 58% in those in whom grafts survived longer than 3 months (p < 0.05). Recipient age, race, renal disease, and levels of panel reactive antibodies had no effect on intermediate-term outcome. In a multiple regression analysis, delayed graft function, acute rejection, and primary graft survival time less than 3 months correlated inversely with long-term survival of retransplants (multiple r = 0.65). A total of 39 grafts were lost due to rejection (22), sepsis (6), graft nonfunction (5), death with a functioning graft (4), noncompliance (1), and recurrent renal disease (1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]