These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effect of methionine addition to a urea-grain supplement on intake and digestibility of mature, dormant grasses and performance of cows grazing winter range. Author: Momont PA, Pruitt RJ, Johnson PS. Journal: J Anim Sci; 1993 Feb; 71(2):515-21. PubMed ID: 8440672. Abstract: A digestibility trial involving 20 Hampshire ram lambs and a 2-yr grazing study using 103 mature crossbred cows were conducted to determine the effects of methionine addition to a urea-grain supplement on intake and digestibility of dormant range grasses and on cow performance. In each trial, four treatment groups were supplemented with either a urea-grain control (CON), urea-grain plus methionine (MET, 3.3% DL-methionine), urea-grain plus inorganic sulfur (SUL, 3.0% sodium sulfate), or soybean meal (SBM). Supplements were designed to provide 45 and 360 g of CP.animal-1.d-1 (lambs and cows, respectively) and were balanced for ME, Ca, P, and K. Lambs had ad libitum access to mature prairie hay, whereas cows grazed dormant winter range from mid-November until mid-February. For the grazing study, forage OM intake (OMI) was determined in late November and in late January by the fecal output/indigestibility ratio technique. Controlled-release chromic oxide boluses were used as an external marker to estimate fecal output, and acid insoluble ash was used as an internal marker to predict OM digestibility (OMD). Mean daily DMI of mature prairie hay was 1,057 g/lamb and was not affected by supplementation. Apparent DM, NDF, and ADF digestibilities and N biological value did not differ (P > .10) among treatments. Nitrogen digestibility was increased (P = .06) for lambs fed the MET or SUL compared with CON.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]