These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Human studies do not support the methylation threshold hypothesis for the toxicity of inorganic arsenic.
    Author: Hopenhayn-Rich C, Smith AH, Goeden HM.
    Journal: Environ Res; 1993 Feb; 60(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 8472646.
    Abstract:
    Inorganic arsenic (In-As) is an established human carcinogen. Methylation to monomethylarsonate (MMA) and dimethylarsinate (DMA) is believed to be the detoxification mechanism for In-As. Urinary measurement of In-As, MMA, and DMA is considered a good biological marker of internal dose to In-As, since it excludes other ingested forms of arsenic which are much less toxic, and because urinary excretion is the main form of elimination of In-As. A methylation threshold hypothesis for In-As has been proposed, stating that after exposure to In-As reaches a certain level or threshold, methylation capacity begins to decline, thus increasing the toxic effects of In-As. We investigated the validity of this hypothesis by analyzing the data from studies which measured urinary In-As, MMA, and DMA in different populations, ranging from background to high occupational and environmental exposure groups. We also present data from our study of a highly exposed population in California. Our analysis focused on the proportion of urinary In-As remaining in the unmethylated form [In-As/(In-As + MMA + DMA)]. The results indicate that epidemiological and experimental human data do not support the methylation threshold hypothesis. On average, 20-25% In-As remains unmethylated regardless of the exposure level. The wide range of interindividual variability in methylation capacity found in some studies warrants further investigation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]