These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Sexual abuse of children. A regional study of the prevalence and characteristics].
    Author: Raupp U, Eggers C.
    Journal: Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1993 Apr; 141(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 8487794.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In contrast to angloamerican countries there are no national figures for the incidence and prevalence of sexual abuse in Germany. Reports based on criminal statistics are inappropriate and are often misinterpreted. METHODS: In this report we present the main results of a regional study of the prevalence of sexual abuse in childhood and compare them with angloamerican studies. RESULTS: Based on replies from 1009 students and apprentices (age > 18y) the prevalence for criminal sexual abuse was found to be 25.2% for females and 6.2% for males. A breakdown of these figures showed that females reported having to experience anal, oral or sexual intercourse (2.3%), physical contact (11.7%), exhibitionism (4.6%) and other sexual behaviour without physical contact (6.6%). For males the prevalence rates for these categories of sexual abuse were 1.5%, 2.4%, 0.9% and 1.5% respectively. All these figures, especially those for males, should be evaluated critically as actual prevalence rates are probably higher. Girls, particularly those aged 6-10 years, are more often involved than boys. Ninety percent of physical abuse happens with persons known to the victim (60% within the family, only 8% with strangers. In general 95% of abusers are male, however in 25% of cases of hands-on-contact with boys the abusers are female. From the relative frequency of reported abuse we estimate the potential incidence to be 1:30 within the family, 1:23 with other acquaintances and 1:6 with strangers. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of regional differences should not be underestimated. These results cannot be generalized for the whole of Germany. Only prevalence studies appropriately reflect the scale of the problem; they are necessary for a broad, a rational and a sufficient planning of strategies designed for prevention, intervention and rehabilitation. More scientifically based epidemiological studies on the extend of sexual abuse are required in Germany.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]