These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Innervation of the trapezius muscle by the intra-operative measurement of motor action potentials.
    Author: Soo KC, Strong EW, Spiro RH, Shah JP, Nori S, Green RF.
    Journal: Head Neck; 1993; 15(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 8491585.
    Abstract:
    Although the surgical anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve and the cervical plexus has been extensively described, the exact motor innervation of the trapezius has been controversial. Attempts to resolve this question have involved anatomic or electrophysiologic studies in human embryos and animals. Extrapolation of the results to adult humans may not be correct. Accurate identification of muscle innervation is obtainable by intra-operative measurement of motor action potentials produced by direct stimulation of the accessory nerve and the cervical plexus. The study involved 14 patients undergoing supraomohyoid or modified neck dissections. Under direct vision, stimulating electrodes were placed on the identified nerves and motor action potentials, and latencies were recorded by surface electrodes placed over the three portions of the trapezius. In 13 patients, when the accessory nerve was stimulated, motor action potentials were obtained in 13 of 13 in the first portion, 11 of 13 in the second portion, and 10 of 13 in the third portion of the trapezius. In the last patient, the accessory nerve ended in the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and innervation of the trapezius was via C3 as demonstrated by motor action potentials. Responses when the roots of the cervical plexus were stimulated varied. Three patterns were seen: In the first group (seven patients), motor action potentials were distinct from those recorded when the accessory nerve was stimulated. Additionally, latencies were different from those of the accessory nerve. The second group (four patients) had motor action potentials that were similar to those obtained from stimulation of the accessory nerve, although their corresponding latencies were different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]