These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Randomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operation.
    Author: Andrews BT, Layer GT, Jackson BT, Nicholls RJ.
    Journal: Dis Colon Rectum; 1993 Jun; 36(6):580-3. PubMed ID: 8500376.
    Abstract:
    Twenty consecutive patients (12 male and 8 female) with second-degree, third-degree, or thrombosed hemorrhoids were randomly allocated to undergo either diathermy hemorrhoidectomy (n = 10) or a scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (n = 10). No significant difference was found in the postoperative pain score between the groups. On a scale of 0 to 10, the mean daily pain score in the diathermy group was 4.0, and it was 4.1 in the scissor dissection group. Nor was there any significant difference in the length of inpatient stay (diathermy group, 3.5 days; scissor dissection group, 4.0 days) or in the time between the operation and the first bowel action (diathermy group, 2.0 days; scissor dissection group, 3.0 days). Diathermy hemorrhoidectomy has no significant advantage over the scissor dissection classical Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]