These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Author: Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Moritz J, Müller D, Grabbe E.
    Journal: Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The impact of different anode materials (tungsten and rhodium) on spatial resolution, image contrast and radiation exposure was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two mammographic systems providing bimetal x-ray tubes (Mo/W and Mo/Rh) were compared by imaging a breast radiography phantom with additional acrylic plates from 3 to 8 cm thickness. Spatial resolution was evaluated using a line bar pattern. Image contrast was assessed by measuring the ratio of optical densities in a acrylic step-wedge. The entrance dose was measured with a low energy ionisation chamber. RESULTS: The spatial resolution was about 13 lp/mm regardless of the beam quality. The image contrast depended substantially on the thickness. A similar image contrast was found with Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and Rh/Rh for simulated breast thicknesses of 4 to 6 cm and with Rh/Rh and W/Rh for 7 cm. In comparison to Mo/Mo the dose reduction was significant for Mo/Rh (35%), Rh/Rh (50%) and W/Rh (60%). CONCLUSIONS: Bimetal x-ray tubes provide optimal conditions for screen film mammography of both normal and dense breasts, allowing good contrast and dose reduction by using the adequate anode/filter-combination.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]