These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Spirometrically controlled quantitative CT for assessing diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Author: Beinert T, Behr J, Mehnert F, Kohz P, Seemann M, Rienmüller R, Reiser M. Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 8537527. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Assessment of lung attenuation by CT reflects changes in the air-to-tissue ratio of the lung. We have analyzed the interdependence of intrathoracic gas volume, lung morphology, and functional disorder by high resolution CT (HRCT) to assess quantitative disease threshold in obstructive and restrictive diffuse lung disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pulmonary HRCT was performed on 24 healthy volunteers, 11 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 16 patients with idiopathic lung fibrosis (IPF). HRCT measurement was standardized by taking three scans at the carina +/- 5 cm and by defining inspiration levels by percent vital capacity (VC) via spirometrically gating to the scanner. RESULTS: The mean lung density at 50% VC (DL50) for healthy subjects was -819 +/- 3.8 (mean +/- SEM) HU. In contrast, COPD DL50 was lower, averaging -861 +/- 6.4 HU, and the IPF DL50 was considerably higher (-731 +/- 17.7 HU), both significantly different (p < 0.001) compared with the control group. The accuracy of quantitative HRCT at different inspiration levels was evaluated by scanning the basal layer at 20, 50, and 80% VC. The control values were -747 +/- 5.6, -816 +/- 3.6, and -855 +/- 3.0 HU, respectively, which were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than those seen in COPD patients at 20 and 50% VC. Again, the IPF patients exhibited increased lung density (p < 0.001) at all inspiratory levels. Discrimination power was best among all cohorts at 20 and 50% VC. Position-dependent artifacts on lung density were quantified by the anteroposterior density gradient (APG). Irrespective of the underlying disease, APG at 50 and 80% VC was similar, but was up to twofold higher at 20% VC, indicating that quantitative estimates near RV may misrepresent mean lung density. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that quantitative HRCT measurements should be performed not near full inspiration or expiration, but at an intermediate degree of lung inflation, e.g., 50% VC, for reasons of accuracy, intra- and intersubjective comparability, and feasibility. We conclude quantitative HRCT to be a sensitive tool for the evaluation of diffuse parenchymal lung disease.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]