These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Electron microscopic analysis of possible ultrastructural damage to spermatozoa after preparation by various methods].
    Author: De Santo M, Strehler E, Uhlich S, Bellati U, Sterzik K.
    Journal: Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Oct; 47(10):409-15. PubMed ID: 8559430.
    Abstract:
    We investigated the possibility of ultrastructural damage to human spermatozoa induced by different sperm preparation techniques. Ejaculates from 20 normozoospermic men were divided into equal aliquots and processed by glass wool filtration, Percoll density gradient centrifugation, and a simple two step centrifugation procedure which served as a control. Ultrastructural damage was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Compared with Percoll density gradient centrifugation, glass wool filtration yielded a significantly increased proportion of intact acrosomes (p < 0.05). However, both preparations gave significantly better results than control (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 for glass wool filtration and Percoll centrifugation, respectively). The conspicuous bending of sperm tails after Percoll centrifugation has a yet unknown importance. In conclusion, both glass wool filtration and Percoll centrifugation are efficient techniques for the accumulation of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes. Because of the higher sperm recovery rate, glass wool filtration appears to be the more appropriate method.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]