These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Mitral valve procedures in ischemic regurgitation. Author: Dion R, Benetis R, Elias B, Guennaoui T, Raphael D, Van Dyck M, Noirhomme P, Van Overschelde JL. Journal: J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Oct; 4 Suppl 2():S124-9; discussion S129-31. PubMed ID: 8563988. Abstract: A restrictive definition of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) has allowed us to select a more uniform cohort of 41 patients having undergone mitral valve surgery for IMR between January 1993 and March 1995. Thirty-six patients (88%) presented with chronic and five with acute IMR. All patients had at least one significant stenosis in the circumflex area. Left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 35%. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed a > or = 3+ MR in 30 patients and an intermittent, fluctuating or grade 2+ MR in 11 (27%). Annulus dilatation was found in all cases, and it was the only mechanism in 10 (24.4%). Leaflet restrictive motion was clearly seen in 17 cases (41.5%) and leaflet prolapse in 14 (34%). In doubtful cases, an intra-operative dynamic testing using TEE, and associating a loading test and an afterload test, led to the indication of a valve procedure in 11/19 patients (58%). An average of three distal coronary anastomoses per patient were constructed. Mitral valve replacement (MVR) was unavoidable in four patients (9.8%); at least the posterior leaflet subvalvular apparatus was preserved in all. Repair of the mitral valve (Mvrep) was achieved in 37 cases (90%). Ring annuloplasty alone was performed in 27 cases (73%). In the remaining 10 cases, leaflet prolapse was corrected by various artifices such as flip-over technique, quadrangular resection, papillary muscle plication or commissuroplasty. At the 10th postoperative day, a residual MR was found in 4/34 cases (11.8%), only after isolated ring annuloplasty. The four patients who have died in the ICU after MVrep belonged to the same group of isolated ring annuloplasty; this mortality of 4/27 (14.8%) illustrates the mediocre prognosis of marked annulus dilatation and impaired LV function with restrictive leaflet motion. Overall, the hospital mortality (14.6%) more reflected the mode of presentation of the patients than the type of operative technique: when a short and definitive procedure is required by a precarious general condition, one should not hesitate to prefer a rapid MVR to a complicated repair. At 4.5 months, there was no significant improvement in LV dimensions. At six months, 80.5% of the patients survived, with 88% of them being in NYHA class I or II.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]