These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: The comparative effects of sodium thiosulfate, diethyldithiocarbamate, fosfomycin and WR-2721 on ameliorating cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Author: Church MW, Kaltenbach JA, Blakley BW, Burgio DL. Journal: Hear Res; 1995 Jun; 86(1-2):195-203. PubMed ID: 8567417. Abstract: The efficacies of four agents in ameliorating cisplatin-induced ototoxicity were investigated. Hamsters were given a series of 5 cisplatin injections (3 mg/kg/injection once every other day, i.p.) either alone or in combination with 1600 mg/kg/injection sodium thiosulfate (STS), 300 mg/kg/injection diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC), 18 mg/kg/injection WR-2721, or 300 mg/kg/injection fosfomycin (n = 10/group). Ototoxicity was assessed electrophysiologically by auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and anatomically by cochlear histology. The greatest auditory protection was given by STS, followed by DDTC. WR-2721 and fosfomycin did not provide any protection. All of the animals in the STS and DDTC groups survived, while some fatalities occurred in the fosfomycin, WR-2721, and cisplatin-only groups. Thus, the agents that were protective against ototoxicity were also protective against mortality. The ABRs also provided evidence of cisplatin-induced neuropathy. In summary, STS and DDTC hold promise for ameliorating the ototoxic effects of cisplatin chemotherapy and the hamster proved to be an excellent model of cisplatin ototoxicity.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]