These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Author: Molloi S, Ersahin A, Hicks J, Wallis J. Journal: Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 8596060. Abstract: Previous studies indicate that conventional geometric edge detection techniques, used in quantitative coronary arteriography (QCA), have significant limitations in quantitating coronary cross-sectional area of small diameter (D) vessels (D < 1.00 mm) and lesions with complex cross-section. As a solution to this problem, we have previously reported on an in-vitro validation of a videodensitometric technique that quantitates the absolute cross-sectional area including small vessel diameter (D < 1.00 mm) and any complex shape of the vessel cross-section. For in-vivo validation, plastic tubing (5-8 mm long) with different shape complex cross-section with known cross-sectional area (A = 0.8-4.5 mm2) were percutaneously wedged in the coronary arteries of anesthetized pigs (40-50 kg). Contrast material injections (6-10 ml at 2-4 ml/sec) were made into the left main coronary artery during image acquisition using a motion immune dual-energy subtraction technique, where low and high X-ray energy and filtration were switched at 30 Hz. A comparison was made between the actual and measured cross-sectional area using the videodensitometry and edge detection techniques in tissue suppressed energy subtracted images. In eighteen comparisons the videodensitometry technique produced significantly improved results (slope = 0.87, intercept = 0.24 mm2, r = 0.94) when compared to the edge detection technique (slope = 0.42, intercept = 1.99 mm2, r = 0.39). Also, a cylindrical vessel phantom (D = 1.00-4.75 mm) was used to test the ability to calculate and correct for the effect of the out of plane angle of the arterial segment on the cross-sectional area estimation of the videodensitometry technique. After corrections were made for the out of plane angle using two different projections, there was a good correlation between the actual and the measured cross-sectional area using the videodensitometry technique (slope = 0.91, intercept = 0.11 mm2, r = 0.99). These data suggest that it is possible to quantitate absolute cross-sectional area without any assumption regarding the arterial shape using videodensitometry in conjunction with the motion immune dual-energy subtraction technique.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]