These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of dynamic and passive measurements of respiratory mechanics in ventilated newborn infants.
    Author: Kugelman A, Keens TG, deLemos R, Durand M.
    Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol; 1995 Oct; 20(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 8606856.
    Abstract:
    Pulmonary mechanics may differ in intubated and ventilated infants depending on whether they are measured by a dynamic or passive method. The objective of this study was to compare respiratory mechanics measured by a dynamic technique with those obtained by a single-breath occlusion technique in ventilated newborn infants. Thirty-one preterm and 15 term infants (mean +/- SD: gestational age, 29.3 +/- 2.3 and 39.5 +/- 1.4 weeks; birth weight, 1.2 +/- 0.5 and 3.4 +/- 0.4 kg; postnatal age, 12 +/- 13 and 5 +/- 4 days, respectively) were studied. Flows were measured through a pneumotachometer placed between the endotracheal tube and the ventilator circuit: tidal volume by integration of flow, and airway pressure directly with a pressure transducer. Airway occlusion was performed with a Neonatal Occlusion Valve (Bicore pulmonary monitor) at the end of inspiration, and the following relaxed exhalation was analyzed to give passive respiratory system compliance (Crs) and resistance (Rrs). These values were compared with dynamic respiratory system compliance (Cdyn) and dynamic expiratory resistance (Re) obtained with the PEDS system (P) within 1 hour, without an esophageal balloon and on the same ventilator settings. Dynamic respiratory system compliance and resistance measured with the PEDS and the Bicore systems did not differ significantly and were well correlated. Mean Cdyn (P) values in preterm and term infants were 77% and 77% of Crs; the equation of the regression line was Cdyn = 0.75 Crs + 0.02 and Cdyn = 0.78 Crs - 0.02; and standard error of the estimate (SEE) was 0.2 and 0.3 mL/cmH2O with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.89 and 0.89 (P < 0.0001), respectively. The mean Re(P) values in preterm and term infants were 68% and 64% of Rrs, and the equation of the regression line was Re = 0.3 Rrs + 63 and Re = 0.5 Rrs + 20, with SEE of 25 and 20 cmH2O/L/sec, and r of 0.65 and 0.69 (P < 0.0001, P < 0.005), respectively. The two methods are non-invasive and were well tolerated. We conclude that passive and dynamic respiratory compliance and resistance measured in intubated infants are highly correlated, although the values measured by the passive technique are higher than those obtained by the dynamic technique.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]