These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: When should the "infected" subcutaneous infusion reservoir be removed?
    Author: Barnes JR, Lucas N, Broadwater JR, Hauer-Jensen M.
    Journal: Am Surg; 1996 Mar; 62(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 8607579.
    Abstract:
    Subcutaneous central venous infusion reservoirs (central venous catheters) are one of the primary devices for administration of intravenous chemotherapy. Usually these devices have few problems, and they provide dependable long term central venous access. Infection of these catheters is a significant problem that usually requires removal. When infection is suspected, it is often difficult to make this determination without actually removing the catheter. Thorough preoperative evaluation may help the surgeon decide which catheters are infected and should be removed. A total of 817 subcutaneous infusion reservoirs were placed at our institution from January 1, 1990 through November 1, 1994. During the same time period, 143 catheters were removed, 63 for suspected infection. The charts of these 63 patients were reviewed to determine to what extent available preoperative information could be used to predict which catheters were infected, thus avoiding unnecessary removal. Twenty-three preoperative parameters were assessed, including physical exam, body temperature, leukocyte count, platelet count, blood cultures from the catheter and peripheral blood, time from placement to removal, whether or not the catheter was functional, and whether it was currently in use. Forty catheters (65%) removed for suspected infection were infected, as demonstrated by a positive culture from the catheter or the wound. Staphylococcus was the most common microorganism. Physical exam (local erythema, tenderness, or swelling) correlated significantly with catheter infection (P = 0.0238). In contrast, blood culture data and the other clinical and laboratory parameters showed no significant association with catheter infection. We conclude that physical exam is the best indicator of catheter infection. Commonly used parameters such as fever, leukocytosis, and positive blood cultures are nonspecific, may not be due to catheter infection, and were not significant in our study. Removal and subsequent restoration of long term intravenous access is associated with significant morbidity and expense. Clinical decision making should not be based on isolated laboratory findings, but must be individualized in each patient with suspected catheter infection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]