These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prothrombin fragment F1+2 and thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) plasma levels in patients with gynecological cancer.
    Author: Gadducci A, Marrai R, Baicchi U, Gagetti O, Facchini V, Genazzani AR.
    Journal: Gynecol Oncol; 1996 May; 61(2):215-7. PubMed ID: 8626135.
    Abstract:
    The pretreatment plasma levels of prothrombin fragment F1+2 and thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) were measured in 56 consecutive patients with gynecological cancer and in 33 apparently healthy volunteer nonpregnant women as control. Prothrombin fragment F1+2 concentrations were significantly elevated in the 18 patients with ovarian cancer (median, 3.2 nmol/ liter; range, 0.9-17.0 nmol/liter, P < 0.0001), in the 24 patients with cervical cancer (median, 1.7 nmol/liter; range, 0.6-15.0 nmol/ liters, P < 0.0001), and in the 14 patients with endometrial cancer (median, 1.5 nmol/liter; range, 0.6-3.0 nmol/liter, P = 0.036) when compared to controls (median, 1.0 nmol/liter; range, 0. 1 -2.1 nmol/ liter). Similarly, TAT levels were significantly higher in patients with ovarian cancer (median, 5.3 microgram /ml; range, 1.3-65.0 microgram/ml , P < 0.0001), cervical cancer (median, 3.8 microgram/ml; range, 2.1 - 11.0 microgram / ml, P < 0.0001), and endometrial cancer (median, 2.7 microgram/ml; range, 1.9-19.0 microgram /ml, P = 0.008) when compared to controls (median, 2.2 microgram/ml; range, 1.0-5.0 microgram/ml). Prothrombin fragment F1+2 levels correlated with TAT levels (r = 0.659, P < 0.0001). Among ovarian cancer patients, prothrombin fragment F1+2 and TAT concentrations correlated with FIGO stage (III-IV versus 1, P = 0.01 and P = 0.003, respectively) and CA 125 levels (P 0.02 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The present data confirmed the occurrence of hemostasis activation in patients with gynecological cancer, and in particular in those with ovarian cancer.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]