These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sequential helical CT angiography of aortoiliac disease.
    Author: Raptopoulos V, Rosen MP, Kent KC, Kuestner LM, Sheiman RG, Pearlman JD.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1347-54. PubMed ID: 8633446.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to study aortoiliac disease with sequential helical CT angiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sequential helical CT angiography combines two successive helical sets for data acquisition obtained during two successive bolus injections of IV contrast material and two breath-holds. Twenty-eight patients with aneurysm and 11 with occlusive disease had CT angiography. Of those 39 patients, 18 also had conventional catheter angiography. For each of the 39 patients, a CT angiogram of three segments of the aorta and 13 arteries was assessed, including the suprarenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal aorta; celiac axis; superior and inferior mesenteric arteries; and pairs of renal, common iliac, hypogastric, external iliac, and common femoral arteries. In 18 patients undergoing both CT and conventional angiography, the appearance of these vessels was graded as occlusive (grade 0), severely stenotic (grade 1), moderately stenotic (grade 2), mildly stenotic (grade 3), normal (grade 4), ectatic (grade 5), and aneurysmal (grade 6). RESULTS: Of the 624 arteries expected to be opacified in 39 patients, 585 (94%) were actually imaged with CT angiography. In the 18 patients who had both CT angiography and catheter angiography, the two studies were in complete agreement in 243 (90%) of 269 arteries. In 13 vessels (5%), CT angiography produced an image that was one grade higher-and in 11 vessels (4%), one grade lower-than conventional angiography. In two vessels, a two-grade difference was noted. The independent readings matched on the 0-6 scale in 95% of the evaluations. An additional 5% of the readings differed by one unit. Compared with conventional angiography, CT angiography of clinically significant (> or = 85%) narrowing (grades 0 and 1) and aneurysm (grade 6) yielded sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 96%, and accuracy of 95%. CONCLUSION: Sequential helical CT angiography of the abdomen can provide sufficient vascular detail to allow evaluation of expanded vascular territories. The technique can allow accurate assessment of both stenotic and aneurysmal disease of the aorta and the iliac arteries.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]