These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats.
    Author: Popelár J, Hartmann R, Syka J, Klinke R.
    Journal: Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):63-77. PubMed ID: 8647747.
    Abstract:
    The middle latency responses (MLR) to acoustical stimulation (A-MLR) as well as to electrical stimulation (E-MLR) of the inner ear were recorded in pentobarbital-anaesthetised cats. Monopolar and bipolar MLR recordings were performed with electrodes located at different places on the primary auditory cortex (AI). The cochlea was electrically stimulated (ES) through a single round-window electrode or through a multichannel intracochlear implant. The slope of amplitude-intensity functions of the A-MLR was steeper when the stimulus frequency of the acoustical stimuli corresponded to the tonotopical recording place on the auditory cortex. Other response properties (waveshape, thresholds and latencies) were related to the recording site and stimulus frequency in only two-thirds of animals. Parameters of E-MLRs evoked by high-frequency ( > 4 kHz) and low-intensity ES in hearing cats, which produced an electrophonic effect, were similar to parameters of acoustically evoked MLRs. In deafened cats, the properties of responses to extracochlear ES were different from those recorded to acoustical stimulation and they were almost uniform in all cortical places. Variations in thresholds, in latencies and in the slope of the amplitude-intensity functions of the E-MLRs recorded in individual tonotopical cortical places were observed when the auditory nerve was stimulated with different configurations of electrodes through a multichannel intracochlear implant.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]