These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Long-term results in revision surgery following lumbar disk nucleotomy]]. Author: Jerosch J, Castro WH. Journal: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 8651003. Abstract: In 6.26% of 846 patients with lumbar disc surgery a reoperation was necessary. A total of 93 patient had undergone a revision surgery inclusive a patient group with primary surgery performed elsewhere. 68 patient had 1 reoperation, 22 patients 2, 2 patients 3, and one patient had even 4 revisions. Follow-up ranged between 19 and 42 years with an average of 31 years. 53 patients were clinically examined at a time of follow up and another 15 patients answered a questionnaire. An excellent result with no complaints and patients able to work could be achieved in only 16%. A good result with no radicular pain, but some minor back pain and some loss of sensibility and ability to work was found in 24%. In 40% of the patients the result was only fair with some radicular pain and limited capability for work. 20% of the patients had only a poor result with unchanged symptoms and continued therapy. Those patients were not able to work. Young and female patients had a better prognosis. Another positive predictor was a short period of preoperative pain. Negative predictors were multiple prior operation as well as scar tissue at time of revision. Also spondylodesis according to Cloward correlated also with a negative clinical outcome.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]