These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Vinorelbine and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter Czech study. Author: Adam Z, Coupková H, Kolek V, Kucera M, Loffelmann L, Martinez A, Nováková M, Průsa P, Reiterer P, Skalová B. Journal: Acta Med Austriaca; 1995; 22(5):120-4. PubMed ID: 8651041. Abstract: There is continuous discussion about the optimal treatment for patients with inoperable non small cell lung cancer. This is because chemotherapy can only improve the quality of life in a fraction of treated patients while prolonging survival by a couple of weeks at best. The new cytostatic drug "vinorelbine" has been tested in this indication during the last years. The drug has reached the response rate of 16 to 30% when used as monotherapy. The phase II studies proved the combination of vinorelbine with cisplatin to be the most efficient one and this combination was picked up for phase III clinical trials. The clinical trial with the aims to verify published data on treatment efficacy, to assess adverse effects of treatment and to evaluate appropriateness for routine application has been made in the Czech Republic. The treatment schedule was as follows: cisplatin (Platidiam Lachema) in a dose of 80 mg/m2 on day 1, vinorelbine (Navelbine Pierre Fabre) in a dose of 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. The whole cycle was repeated on day 22. The treatment was applied for 12 weeks. After that the efficacy of treatment was evaluated and only the patients with regression or stabilization of the disease continued the treatment. 44 (35%) partial remissions and 3 (2.3%) complete remissions were achieved in a group of 126 evaluable patients. The effect of treatment was evaluated as stable disease in 35 (27%) patients while the progression of disease occurred in 38 (30%) patients. The tolerance of treatment using effective antiemetic support (ondansetron or granisetron) was fairly good.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]