These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Initial results of automated lamellar keratoplasty for correction of myopia: one year follow-up.
    Author: Lyle WA, Jin GJ.
    Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996; 22(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 8656358.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To report our initial results with automated lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) to correct myopia and to evaluate the short-term efficacy, safety, and predictability of this procedure. METHODS: A prospective series of 128 eyes of 81 consecutive patients who had ALK were reviewed for a mean follow-up of 13.6 months (range 12 to 19 months). Preoperative data, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative visual acuity, refraction, keratometric readings, and complications at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, 1 year, and last follow-up visit were used for analysis. The procedure was performed for myopia in 120 eyes (-4.50 to -13.25 diopters [D]) and for residual myopia following radial keratotomy (RK) in eight eyes (-1.75 D to -3.75 D). A hinged-flap technique was used in 17 cases (13%) once this method was introduced. RESULTS: Preoperative mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.04 +/- 0.05 (20/500). Postoperatively (12 to 19 months), overall uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 86.4% of eyes with a mean uncorrected acuity of 0.68 +/- 0.22 (20/30) 76.2% of eyes were within 1.00 D of emmetropia and 93.6%, within 2.00 D. After the initial ALK procedure, 77% of eyes had RK or astigmatic keratotomy (AK). Among the 29 eyes with ALK alone, 86% had 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity, with mean uncorrected acuity and mean corrected acuity of 0.69 +/- 0.21 (20/30) and 0.95 +/- 0.10 (20/21), respectively; 72% of eyes were within 1.00 D of emmetropia and 90%, within 2.00 D. In 4%, astigmatism increased more than 1.00 D from the preoperative value and 4% of eyes (5/128) had persistent irregular astigmatism. Four percent of eyes (5/128) had overcorrection, with a final spherical equivalent greater than +1.00 D. Epithelial growth in the interface requiring surgical removal occurred in 2% of cases. One eye with residual myopia from a previous RK lost the cap after ALK. A homologous donor graft was performed, which resulted in 20/30 uncorrected visual acuity. Best corrected visual acuity of two lines or more was lost in 6.3% of eyes (8/128). This was caused by irregular astigmatism in 63% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our initial experience indicate that ALK is a reasonably safe, effective, and predictable procedure for correction of high myopia and myopia following previous RK. With additional enhancement with RK/AK, good visual and refractive outcome can be expected.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]